Back to Insights

Market Commentary

Understanding Net APY versus Gross Yield

Published on July 12, 2025

Investors often encounter similar-sounding measures which include gross yield and net annual percentage yield, which appear in savings brochures, fund factsheets, and decentralised-finance dashboards. This guide explains what each figure means, which elements influence each measure, and which checks help one decide whether a headline rate matches personal expectations.

Gross yield in outline

Gross yield expresses return before charges or taxes, which is calculated as yearly income divided by the purchase price or present market price, and which regulators accept as a quick screening metric for bonds, property, and funds. Because the formula ignores operating costs, the percentage can overstate cash that ultimately reaches an account. (Investopedia)

Prosperity Wealth explains that gross yield supplies a broad perspective which aids first-pass comparison, while net yield illustrates real-world performance that includes costs. (Prosperity Wealth)

APY and compounding

Annual percentage yield, often shortened to APY, standardises compound interest so that deposits with different compounding frequencies become comparable. The standard expression uses the equation below, which assumes reinvestment of each interim interest credit for one full year. (Investopedia)

APY = (1 + r/n)n − 1

Where Net APY fits

Net APY incorporates the effect of management charges, protocol fees, taxes, or slippage, which means that the figure approximates the return that an account holder truly earns, since recurring costs reduce the balance before further compounding occurs. Wikipedia notes that the standard APY shown by banks does not account for fees, which is why a separate net figure is useful. (Wikipedia)

Gross Yield
before charges
Minus costs
fees + taxes
Net APY
after charges and compounding

A numerical illustration

Consider a savings platform that credits interest at a nominal five-per-cent rate with monthly compounding, which leads to a gross APY of roughly 5.12%. If the platform also subtracts a management charge of 0.50% each year, the net APY that reflects compounding after charges falls to about 4.59%. The apparently small fee therefore removes roughly one-tenth of the gross gain, which demonstrates the power of compounding in reverse.

Fund performance and expense ratios

Mutual-fund performance figures that appear in United Kingdom factsheets are presented after the management-expense ratio, which means that the quoted total return resembles a net APY. Gross yield may also feature in technical notes, which allows observers to measure how much value the strategy adds relative to its fee load. RBC analysis provides an illustrative case in which a nine-per-cent portfolio gain becomes a seven-per-cent reported figure once a two-per-cent expense ratio is applied. (RBC GAM)

Regulatory disclosure

In the United States the Truth in Savings framework defines APY disclosures for deposit accounts and provides rounding guidance, which ensures that providers use a common format. (CFPB) Meanwhile the Financial Conduct Authority requires funds and platforms to display charges clearly so that savers can recognise the drag on returns. (FCA)

Bringing it together

Practical evaluation therefore proceeds in two stages, which start with checking whether the advertised rate is gross or net, and which continue with estimating the compounding schedule, so that an investor translates figures into pounds received rather than percentages promised.